Tag Archives: Photoshop

Design Inspiration: Masters of Book Design

I don’t know about anyone else, but I often do judge books by their covers. Literally. It’s the story you encounter before the story ever begins. I’ve been notorious for buying attractive (I was going to say “sexy” but thought you may think I was taking it a bit too far) books regardless of their content. Why not right?

Anyway, book design is a large part of daily graphic design encounters. Speaking as an avid reader, I’d rather have my eyes rest on a beautiful design rather than an eyesore. Otherwise it’s like dragging nails across a chalkboard, but with your eyes….yeah…something like that.

Here is a list of sites to help inspire your inner book drunkard and designer.

Master Book Designers

Salamander Hill Design

Peter Mendelsund

Chip Kidd

John Gall

Henry Sene Yee

Tobias Design


The future of Screens and Gadgets.

In todays society, our toys are what seem to set us apart. Who has the newest, biggest, smallest, best, brightest, and most revolutionary tech makes us the big man on campus…or the popular girl in school. But what direction is technology hoping to go? We’ve seen the flux between bigger and smaller phones. We’ve seen the revolution of touch screens. We’ve seen the beginnings of being able to share information wirelessly from one device to another. But, for what? What is the potential future of technology, and is it really something we want to continually have access to?


Technology and Beauty

Recently in a photoshop class we were being taught the importance of using photoshop wisely. Part of me was annoyed by the fact that we had to go through the ethical discussion of image manipulation simply because it didn’t seem that important. We were all adults, and unless we were dealing with 13 year-olds who were unable to understand the importance of maturity in a work environment, we didn’t need to hear it. the professor spoke sternly (which seemed out of character from his usual chipper and joking self) to us about the importance of keeping major facial imperfections in photographs (especially when they are noticeable). It seemed like a no brainer.

As we continued on in our discussion our professor showed us this video from the Dove Real Beauty campaign. He then continued on to say that it was important to show reality for what it was, not just because something looks aesthetically correct or beautiful. After watching the short film it became clear, and it is no wonder there are so many women and men in the world who have a twisted view of beauty. What was even more outrageous was the possibility that the campaign it’s self was even photoshopped to make the actors look real but not unattractive (for more info: http://www.stylelist.com/2008/05/08/doves-campaign-for-real-beauty-was-photoshopped/).

Don’t get me wrong, I do not believe that technology is responsible for the staggering number of young people with eating disorders or self mutilation problems (though I’m sure their use doesn’t help). However it does cause one to think about how they use the technology. People tend to forget that technology is meant to be our tool, not vice versa. When a new technology is introduced we tend to feel obligated to put it to use and it is this obligation that causes us to allow technology to control us (or rather can make people obsessed in finding a use). Technology as simple and harmless as photoshop can be used for malicious reasons. It is important for us as users to discern when it’s art, and what is false advertising.